Brunson v. Adams - The Fallout and Reconstitution of the United States

Originally posted to Twitter 12/9/22 https://twitter.com/ahoenecke

1) This case sits on the docket at SCOTUS (22-4007) and will be heard in Conference on J6 2022. If you read my previous thread you will see how it got there and a general overview of the Complaint

2) To summarize, if SCOTUS votes to take it to hearing, it could remove the Certification of 385 Congressmen along with Pence and the current admin. This thread will outline what this court is all about, and why it wants this case - bottom line, this Court is about Reconstitution

3) There is a great series of Substack articles by the https://17sog.substack.com/archive? sort=new that outlines what Trump tried to do during his presidency. You may need this for background. The actions he took, along with SCOTUS back up the theory that Reconstitution was his primary goal.

4) What is Reconstitution? Basically, cleaning up the 3 branches of government, removing the bad actors, and setting precedent with actions and rulings to bring back into alignment the original power of the US Constitution as it was written - and intended to be upheld.

5) In other words, DRAINING THE SWAMP - "We caught them all, we've got it all on tape. Let's see what happens". So, as it relates to SCOTUS, let's take a look at how it has participated in Reconstitution thus far, especially since Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Gorsuch have joined.

6) First, let's start with some ground breaking decisions in the last year (without getting into the weeds to much): Roe v. Wade - reverses prior precedent and pushes abortion back to the states - Reconstitutes the power of the States to decide it legality vs. Federal mandate.

7) NYS Rifle v Bruin - reverses conceal carry precedent restrictions, Reconstituting the 2nd Amendment and leveling the playing field for citizens v a potentially tyrannical government.

8) WV v EPA - reverses precedent that Administrative Agencies can mandate policy, vs Congress and Courts. In other words, regulation and legislation has now been Reconstituted back to both the Legislative and Judicial branches.

9) Moore v. Harper (pending). If upheld, will set allow State Houses to choose their own electors (Ind. State Legis. Theory), thus setting precedent for States to Reconstitute their right to send electors to Congress without obstruction by State Courts, Commissions, or Governors.

10) So, we have seen that this SCOTUS has been all about Reconstitution, and since it decides which cases it will hear or not, most via requesting through Writ of Certiorari, we also know there must be a reason it wanted Brunson v. Adams.

11) Aside from past actions, and the simple fact the SCOTUS twice asked Brunson how quickly it could get the case to it, there is something a brewin'!! Now, let's get to the Fallout, and Reconstitution that comes out of this case.

12) I'm just a regular guy who is trying to develop a golf mat side business, so hopefully as I write this it connects with the regular folks. My homework has consisted of over 3000 hours of reading Substacks, podcasts, and following the political scene since the 2020 election.

13) As such, I've watched just about every interview Loy Brunson has done since this case came on the scene. In a nutshell, if SCOTUS rules in favor any action or inaction that does not "support or defend the constitution" would set precedent of violation of Oath of Office. Yuge!

14) In the 10th Circuit https://casetext.com/case/brunson-v-adams, defense argued that Sovereign Immunity was a colorable defense that, in effect, trumps any claims that a Federal Official could be held accountable for violation of Oath of Office.

15) However, since Article 6 https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-6/of the US Constitution binds Federal Officials in all 3 branches, plus State and Local Officials, it stands to reason that a SCOTUS that has been all about Reconstitution may have something up its sleeve.

16) THE FALLOUT: Is this case just about overturing 2020? That's the least of it. A Reconstitutional ruling here sets precedent that anyone who is still bound by their oath, cannot, by action or inaction, violate it by "not defending against all enemies, foreign or domestic."

17) As we can see via the Twitter files (more to come), the public evidence is now mounting that there was a Racketeering Operation underway by the DNC, current administration, and many others to not only squelch free speech, but also interfere in a federal election.

18) More is coming out about voter fraud (Arizona keystone), Konech (foreign interference), Durham (Russiagate Hoax), and Weiss (Byeden family). Soon, it appears eminent that a massive RICO case could connect virtually every bad player in these operations.

19) Once these charges are brought, and if indeed this case sets precedent that Oath trumps Immunity, anyone now connected to this operation can be connected to treason. Here we have likely tens of thousands who have sworn an oath, from Senators to local Judges.

20) Anyone connected who failed to act or acted in violation of their Oath would immediately be removed by Federal Marshalls, National Guard, who knows how it would roll out. They could no longer serve in public office ever again. The FALLOUT would be massive • • •

21) Not to mention the punishment for treason, which may indeed be why Gitmo has been built out with two brand new courtrooms. See the 300K plus sealed indictments that have accumulated in the past six years as well (ahem). The free Federal criminal database Map of Total Cases by State http://bad-boys.us/

22) So, with these SCOTUS cases setting precedent, and Reconstituting the Federal Government back to its original 3 branches, all that remains is to finish the job of DRAINING THE SWAMP. Brunson v. Adams is the final kill shot all the way down to the local election clerk.

23) IMO, yes, there is something going on behind the scenes as far as the current status of our Constitutional Republic. The evidence is overwhelming via his EOs, appointments, and statements that Trump took some sort of a COG action after he met with his Generals on 12/18/20.

24) It is my belief that even though evidence of coordinated voter fraud existed and was presented at that meeting with the Military, it was not yet ready to act on it, and wanted our country to be united and ready to organically take it back via the Courts and the Constitution.

25) We are here. We have been shown the bad actors, the fraud, and the story line. Much more is still coming, and it will be ugly. Nevertheless, let the fallout begin with Brunson v Adams. Reconstitution, Removal, Reunification, and Repair. God Bless!