Brunson v. Adams - The Rightful Cure
Originally posted to Twitter 12/10/22 https://twitter.com/ahoenecke
1) If you've read my previous two threads on this case in front of SCOTUS, you will understand how it got there, why it got there, and the potential ramifications of decertifying 385 Congressional Members.
2) This case askes SCOTUS to not only remove these 385 Congressional Members and the former VP, but also the current VP and POTUS. However, we must look back at what went down in December of 2020, and also what is likely to happen in the upcoming Moore v. Harper case.
3) Additionally, we must remember that even if Congress violated their collective Oaths of Office, potentially sending a Manchurian Candidate to the WH, is the remedy request to remove the current VP and POTUS just and fair?
4) Although there is more and more evidence that continues to mount regarding 2020 & 2022 election interference, it has not yet been proven in any court of law. Therefore, the only defendants that would have violated an oath under this complaint are Congress and the former VP.
5) One could argue that the beneficiaries of the act of violating an oath under Article 6 of the Constitution could be removed, but what if SCOTUS does not take that course of action? Perhaps there is a rightful cure going on right now that is in the process of taking place...
6) Let's revisit and important day back in December of 2020. On December 14, 2020, States had their Electors sent to Congress. But, on the same day Republican Electors from the "seven swing states" also sent Certificates to Congress in favor of Trump. These Electors were ignored.
7) We don't have to get into the weeds on the legality, precedent, and details of having two slates of Electors before Congress, but suffice it to say they were presented.
8) Now let's fast forward to our Reconstitution minded SCOTUS. It met on December 7, 2021 to hear arguments regarding Moore v. Harper, a case in front of it that appears to only involve election maps. Or so it seems... HUGE DEVELOPMENT: Supreme Court Finally Ready to Hear Argumen… The US Supreme Court agreed in June to hear the Moore vs. Harper case related to the subject referred to as the independent state legislature theory. This case will have huge consequences. Breitbart… https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/two-years-late-supreme-court-finally-ready…
9) If SCOTUS rules in favor of NC, it would set a precedent that State Courts cannot usurp the authority of State Legislatures. The argument goes back to Article II, Section 1 of the US Constitution, that gives State Legislatures the unmitigated right to forward Electors.
10) This is known as the Independent State Legislature Doctrine, but has yet to be thoroughly vetted in the courts. Again, we must remember that both Trump and SCOTUS have been about precedent and Reconstitution. In other words, doing it by the book.
11) Let's fast forward one more time to Brunson v. Adams and the fallout. Assuming for a minute that SCOTUS only removes 385 Congressional members and the former VP, but does not feel it has the authority to remove the current VP and POTUS until a new vote, what next?
12) Here we would have virtually no Congress and a Constitutional Crisis. Or do we? With our Reconstitution minded SCOTUS, and with a favorable ruling on both Moore v. Harper as well as Brunson v Adams, precedent would not be set for the following scenario...
13) Brunson v. Adams calls for either new POTUS vote or recertification. Moore v. Harper allows for State Legislatures to forward Electors of their choice to Congress. Alternate Electors sent on 12/14/20 now valid and a new Congress can approve and Certify Trump as winner of 2020
14) And, if for some reason Congress is not able to make a decision based on number of members or time to replace, Article II Section 1 also has a provision for a "State by State" vote, where one Representative from each state selects VP and POTUS.
15) With the majority of Statehouses being Republican, this would also put Trump back in the WH. In summary, there is a rightful cure to not only remove Congressional members who violated their oath, but also to Constitutionally place the rightful winner back in office.